|
|
"One of the most inventive and talented
songwriters in the business today"
- Isaac Davis Jr. MBA, Editor in
Chief of Junior's Cave Online
Magazine
|
|
|
|
|
Tracks
- The Cool Fugue
- Edge of sanity
- Prelude in D minor for three pianos
- Chopin and Kapustin waltzing
- Two pianos teetering on the edge of a cliff
- Between Bach and Chopin
- Riding on a horizontal lightning bolt
- Two birds gliding across rolling hills and green meadows
- Tiger with tail on fire chases after antelope
- Pearls falling from the necklace
- Ice melting fast
- Zoom in on Mercury
- Young pony looking at its reflection in the water
- Pensive Tristan
- Sehnsucht
- Slight doubt and patience
- Small old clock with a regal personality
- Standing stable - in a stable way that is, not in a horse stable
- Stroking black keys
- Tired Japanese tree shedding leaves
- Two bear cubs playing at the start of spring
- Water dripping from icicle
- Lullaby for a hibernating bear cub
- Ice melting at a leisurely pace
- Ice melting slowly
- Flower petals being gently rocked by large and slow waves
- It’s going to be ok, you can sleep now
- Blues with a (B) minor twist
- Blues
|
With one exception, the first piece, this is a piano-only album. Conceptually, there are four parts. Hence the name of the album. Obviously.
Some full-length clips for you
The Cool Fugue
|
Ice melting fast
|
Two birds gliding across rolling hills and green meadows
|
Prelude in D minor for two pianos
|
Edge of Sanity
|
Chopin and Kapustin waltzing
|
Pearls falling from a necklace
|
Riding on a horizontal lightning bolt
|
And now for something completely different: This album is a pacifist in the loudness war
Huh?
For a number of reasons,
the dynamic range (in simplistic terms, the difference in volume
between the loudest moments in a piece of music and the average volume)
of music recordings, particularly in the pop music neck of the woods,
has dramatically decreased over the years - a phenomenon also referred
to as the " loudness war". That is what the blue logo further up on the page is about.
I
recently had the unique honour and privilege of speaking to one of the
world's leading lights on the subject, Mr Friedemann Tischmeyer,
President of the Pleasurize
Music Foundation (PMF), a global umbrella organization which
represents specific interests of music listeners
on the one hand, as well as the interests of music industry
participants such as musicians, composers, sound engineers, record
companies and broadcasters on the other hand. Mr Tischmeyer kindly
contributed the following explanations to my website, and I would like
to thank him very much:
Hi Ben and hi to everyone reading this,
Ben
and I had an interesting dialogue about the loss of dynamic compression
in contemporary pop music and the need to keep creating awareness of
the issues that are associated with it.
Since the technical terms themselves can seem slightly abstract and
irrelevant to you as listeners, I just wanted to add a word or two on
what the loss of dynamic range means specifically for your experience of
music. There are essentially two main concerns:
Firstly, a
lack of dynamic range, at a minimum, fatigues your hearing. The
experience of listening to music has a number of psycho-acoustic facets
to it, of which volume is one. In music with a low dynamic range,
the differences in objective volume are removed so that the music, in
terms of its sound engineering, will have to compensate for that lack of
impact by having a higher dynamic compression.
To give you an example, in highly compressed music, there is no such
thing as a crescendo since objectively, all sound hits you at exactly
the same volume. If there was a natural ebb and flow in the music, it's
gone.
As a result, the ears (technically, the hair cells in the Cochlea, inside your inner ear) are left without periods of micro-relaxation because they are constantly under fire.
It follows that the cumulative stress on the hearing is much higher.
You can compare it to holding a hot air dryer directly in your face,
which is bound to become increasingly uncomfortable the longer you do
it. One upshot of this is
simply a form of listener fatigue - when you get a sudden sense of
wanting to switch off the music and give your ears a rest.
Problematically, the effects of the lack of recreation go beyond mere fatigue.
We have reason to believe that excessive compression in music is in
fact one of the most significant reasons for the high increase in the
development of hearing impairments and we are currently supporting
several academic studies which examine precisely that causal
relationship.
Secondly,
music with a higher dynamic range just sounds better. Many contemporary
releases are mercilessly over-compressed, a situation
that turns off even the biggest music fans among you. Having mentioned
psychoacoustic aspect of listening to music earlier: Differences in
volume not only allow your ear to distinguish between loud and soft, but
it also to distinguish between different sounds. Once the
audio is compressed, you cannot get that sonic breadth back somehow,
it's gone. The result from your perspective as listener is, quite
simply, a worse-sounding record. To quote Steely Dan: "God is in the
details and there are no details anymore".
In
view of the considerations I've set out above, the aim of the
Foundation is to encourage recording artists and sound engineers, for
instance, to deliver that natural and dynamic sound on new album
releases, and to encourage you as music listeners to show your support.
Friedemann Tischmeyer
Now,
I am aware that in championing the cause, I am opening myself up to
charges of the highest hypocrisy, but I will readily admit that I am a
selective participant in the loudness war, in that on non-instrumental
albums, I select a number of songs per album which will need to be
pitched in some way, or submitted to radio stations without FM
compression so that it's necessary for the pieces to be more compressed,
simply because they aren't listened to in the same way that you will
listen to them when you have the whole album in front of you.
So then?
I
am making amends in creating loudness peace, and I have made this album
the completely neutral Switzerland of instrumental albums. Each song on this album has been measured with the TT DR Offline Meter Software supplied by the Pleasurize Music Foundation. The "4" album accordingly has an official DR value of DR12,
which means it compares rather favourably with contemporary pop music,
for instance, where a typical dynamic range would be at DR4 or even
less. A value of DR14 (the ultimate goal that the foundation seeks to impress upon the recording industry) is attained by the album "The story of what happened...". |
|
|
|
|
|